Divekio
-
Posts
45 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Posts posted by Divekio
-
-
3 minutes ago, Aleira said:
lol... has it ever occurred to you that not all clans want wars? We don't go around hunting people, and don't really look for trouble at all. This is a game mechanic that allows people to defend themselves from toxic players, of which Chronos has/had plenty. anyone who wants this change is just mad because they're unable to grief us freely.
Divekio and MS: "Please GM's allow us to grief anyone we want"
Yourself just pk'ed our members as today, GM can check your logs so dont talk about toxicity, when you are abusing a system created to help new players and clans. You are a game mechanics exploiter and we wait for severe actions against players who do so .
-
2 minutes ago, L0RELEI said:
It wouldnt serve a point even. Like..
Lets say a 14 ppl clan can get warred. Whats stopping those people to always be untagged and only tag up in a clan when its siege/pvp time?
So you try finding more ways of exploiting the game system, more then your clan does now ?
-
12 minutes ago, ChocolateChip said:
110% Agree that clan with under 14 members should not be allowed to participate in Castle Sieges!
The castle siege is about pvp, why would this clans witch are not able to have clan wars would be allowed go in siege zones. They are exploiting the game because siege is not only about the siege grounds, pvp happens outside siege zones as in clan wars also .
-
2 minutes ago, Xiang said:
what nonsense are you talking about?
you took advantage and did the same in magmeld
are you crying now?
turns into a boy.
before we cry about it we must wait for them to fix all the problems of the game.FYI i never played in magmeld server, we speak seriously here if you just came to flame please mind your businiess.
-
3 minutes ago, L0RELEI said:
There have been multiple times where certain clans were forcing war declaration kills. What ure looking for is basically "hey if we war u, u wont be able to attack us, because i know u don't war. But we will keep trying to get our war up with u by force flagging just like multiple times before".
Doesn't seem fair now, does it? I mean, even if u get a war on the 14ppl clan, whats stopping those ppl from just detagging and doing same thing? U can't declare wars on untagged people either.
And whenever 14 ppl clans "run around griefing other players and clans" as u so put it... u can fight back, cant u? They are flagged aren't they? How many times have u been the one who "runs around griefing people and clans"? It was even recorded. So please, carry on about how 14 people clans "run around and grief people".Then whoever is in a 14 player clan and pk another player should be permanently banned .
-
Just now, Cochise said:
Clans like your use the macro pk bug to get the other clan to get 5 kills. Sorry Buddy.
The game now allows any player set up their farming MONSTERS only so cannot kill no other players . Sorry buddy i dont know what exploits you are talking about my clan plays the game clean.
-
2 minutes ago, Galador said:
@Divekio, the issue you describe goes both ways. I have seen abuses on the other side as well. People who automatically go to war with someone to impede them from retaliating to griefing. You present one side of the story, but not the other. It's because of the griefing and the attitudes of pvp'ers like yourself that people find ways to hide, not the other way around. The game is big enough to allow people to play the game they want to play. But I'm fairly certain that you don't understand that because you believe everyone should be subject to your whims.
One cannot go automatically to war as you saying , have to kill the other player 5 times, sorry buddy you are wrong .
-
1 minute ago, justAnotherISS said:
I agree, also any clans that attended siege with 14 players during siege and got castle should be reset and banned for 7 days for taking advantage of such an exploit.
Couldn't agree more.It is obviously an exploit in my opinion, but this is why forum exist so people can share their toughts. Thank You!
-
2 minutes ago, Fumb said:
I never heard of this. I thought was based on the clans level not numbers. Are you sure?
Yes I am sure.It is both by clan lvl and the amount of players inside clan.
-
There have been so many changes in the game as of late and I feel like we should reevaluate not being able to declare war to a clan that has less than 15 players in it. There are several people taking advantage of this. They keep the clan at 14 people and are pk’ing others in the game with no consequences besides a “debuff”. They can attend siege and not have war declared as well. They run around griefing other players and clans. If they do not want war, they should refrain from doing such things and war will not be declared. They should not be exempt from having consequences for their actions. Some have even gone as far as to purchase new clans to put other members in to prevent war from being declared on them. I feel like they are taking advantage of the under 15 members limit and it’s not intended for what they are doing. Thank You!
-
12
-
2
-
-
Is 14 players clan an exploit in the game ?
in General Live Discussion
Posted · Edited by Divekio
In that case , if a clan pk you and you dont want start war, killing the Pk does not start the war.I understand what you are saying but PK ing has penality. My problem is about clan under 14 players who abuse this system who is intended to help people like you . It is just not working anymore in the way that was intended and has to be changed .