Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About PabloC

  1. LF Crafter Theca Gaiters

  2. LF Crafter Theca Gaiters

    Need crafter for Theca Gaiters. Mail pqxyz Thank you.
  3. Greater Heal problem?

    But healing ove power is not consistent, why?. If a healing skills says 100 power, and other one says 200 power, that'd mean that'd heal for double the power. This is not the case. Eficency is more like a consecuence of this problem imo.
  4. Greater Heal problem?

    You are not giving a lot of info.
  5. Greater Heal problem?

    Yeah, in dmg there are a lot of values that influence total output. Plus, damage is always tied to a RNG that gives out a wide range of damage, not a fixed number. Heals are pretty much straight forward, and there are not supposed to be too much of hidden values. That's why my title is a question: is this working as intented even though is not making sense? is skill power description wrong? I'd like to have access to other l2 classic, like KR PTS or something (or they should do a test server) to see if this works the same way across all classics. Maybe there's something wrong, maybe there is not. I'm just posting my test and calculations that shows that something is not quite as logical expected. Guess I'll wait for some answer from @Hime, who is very active and polite, or an official word, if I ever get one. Thx for your answer, nevertheless
  6. Greater Heal problem?

    Game mechanics have a logic, that's why they are mechanics and not things that happen. If a game skill power is the double of similar game skill power, in same context results should be double. Since Heal is not affected by rng, I'm providing evidence that is either not working properly or not decribed properly. Saying that 99% of the skills doesn't make sense is a stament you have made but you don't give any evidence that is actually that way. And yes, greater heals, have better time efficency but, acording to skill description, should have better power-mana efficency, but, has you can see, it doensn't. So, either it description is wrong, or it's not working properly.
  7. Greater Heal problem?

    Hello everybody. I'm a bishop and I have been noticing that Greater Heal is not entirely healing as much as expected from years of experience. I know there are many issued in NA servers right now, buy haven't read anyone talking about this one in particular, so that's why I make this thread. In order to provide evidence, I run a quick test and made some math so you can easily see my point. Test have been done with a lv. 42 Bishop with a D grade weapon (42 m atk) using BSSD and wearing a divine set. The skills I used were: Greater Heal lv. 4 Power: 376 acording to skill description MP Cost: 64 Heal lv 18 Power: 301 acording to skill description. MP Cost: 52 That means that Greater Heal lv 4 has an effective cost of 5.875 power/MP and heal has and effective cost of 5.78846 power/MP. Logic dictates that Greater Heal has better cost / benefit relation, but in practice is not. In my test, with Greater Heal lv 4, I healed my self for 540 HP, whil with Heal lv 18 I healed my self for 463 HP, both with same weapon, buffs, set, and bssd activated. That means that with Heal lv 18, I healed for 8.9038 HP/MP, and with Greater Heal lv 4 I healed for 8.4375 HP/MP. That means that Greater Heal has worse cost / benefit relation, the oposite at what should be acording to skill power. In other words: Heal lv 18 heals for 1.5382 HP / Power, while Greater Heal heals for 1.43617 HP / Power. Why there's a difference? Doesn't make any sense at all. I hope you didn't got bored and confused with all the math and numbers, just trying to prove that this is not working as it should be by logic. What's the point on learning a lv 42 skill if is less cost effective than the one that I learned at lv 35? And more important, why healing power is not equal among both skills? If healing power represents an estable value, a skill with 372 healing power should heal 124% more than one with healing power of 301, not 117% more; it just doesn't make any sense at all. Please gms, look this problem. Thank you.