ChocolateChip
-
Posts
59 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by ChocolateChip
-
-
5 minutes ago, Hydrogen said:
Don't get me wrong i agree 100% with you. If they remove the 5 kills trigger, someone can fight back for the spot, fight back the bully. Now its impossible, cause a possible engage, will affect the whole clan. Thats my point. But in any case i totally agree with you.
I dont think you guys know the full story of the situation tho. PvP between FS/MS is back and forth therefore FS will call ProPvE sometimes. With this being said, FS/MS both know to hold a party back in the pvp to wait out skills. However, both sides have been pushing through forcing that 2nd party to use defensives. Now, after this being said, with no war being up on ProPvE, we are not able to push through and make them use skills. Therefore ultimately, we have a very slim chance of being the last people standing which is what is considered a 'win'.
ProPvE is not a neutral clan whatsoever. That is 100% a lie. Therefore making this clan member limit declaration system an abuse. -
@Fumb The thing is, they abuse it to have their side win pvp. (FS/Nova/ProPvE). If they actually were just neutral then it wouldn't matter, but they aren't. What I posted is a possible solution with a minor consequence if they try to continue to bypass it.
-
@Gonein60Seconds @hellesbelles @Aleira
Entire server knows you abuse the 14 clan member system
I don't know why you guys are trying to hide it 0.0 -
All I would like is for them to fix it.
Either:
-Allow wars to be declared/accepted to any clan
-Don't allow clans with under 15 members be allowed to participate in sieges
Or if @L0RELEI wants to abuse that if they change it to either of those options by stating you guys will just drop clan and retag for sieges. Then make a penalty of not being allowed to join the same clan for 14 days, (Full Siege Cycle). Or a new clan for 7 Days.-No ban or penalty should be given out. Just a fix
-
the thing is. it's very obvious that the players abusing this aren't new players, as well as the clan isn't a new clan. I would like to just see this fixed.
-
110% Agree that clan with under 14 members should not be allowed to participate in Castle Sieges!
-
1
-
-
+1 even though I've rerolled 4 times now because this service is not available... oof
-
Who attacked whos castle first last siege? Because I remember relaxing at Giran and then having FistingTime/Aratus (2 DW) party come and kill us. May I add that we had no intention of going to attack any castle that siege, as we did not even put consumables on until after we decided to return the favor.
See ya next siege!
P.S. It was funny seeing full parties of MS lined up off siege zone because we wiped them when they entered
-
Our CP has offered to do a 7v7 against any Nova party, as well as we even offered to do our CP vs x2 Nova pts.... heck, we even offered to do our CP vs all of Nova and yet you guys still decline. So don't come on the forums stating that you guys want to do a 7v7 when we have offered to do them since we left you guys...
-
2 hours ago, LadySerson said:
The only way to get rid of the ms zerg? Simple. Stop engaging them, stop pvping them, stop sieging, ignore them. They will get bored of having all this gear and nothing to do and will try to form up another side, or simply will quit. It is already happening, if you guys could see the PMS from MS members you'd laugh (No I don't share PMS because I am not a 13 year old girl like choco).
I shared a few PMs of Mutch telling me Novas plan of getting every clan on Chronos to not come to siege and to not PvP MS. Get over it Pope and stop being a crybaby. He openly shared that information anyways so why does it matter? I just think someones a little salty that they aren't allowed to PvP with their 2T Dragon Wep
Is 14 players clan an exploit in the game ?
in General Live Discussion
Posted
MS does not abuse this system, as ProPvE has been doing