Jump to content

Aleira

Adventurers
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Aleira

  1. Ive never crit errored ever... but just playing oly on an alt and crit errored.... the connection to the dim server is broken, and disconnects cost 5x as many points as a loss.  BROKEN SYSTEM FIX IT!

     

  2. 8 minutes ago, Boosted said:

    60?  there is atleast 80-90 from ur side camping, while the EU clans can get max 1-2 pts, coz rest cant, so if they should change, u think it will affect from ur side? i doubt it.

    Your numbers are very highly exaggerated.  My estimated number of 60 active is both sides combined. 

    nova+ProPVE usually has around 45 people, and until recently FS+Mapogos had around 15 that actually participated, with several others who were active but didnt attend or play untagged evis.

     

    If this event was shifted to an earlier time.  total participation would easily be cut in half or even worse.

    • Like 1
  3. 4 minutes ago, Priester said:

    Distorsion of the truth Pope ! 

    YOu want more PVP, just support EURO players  and ask to put the Sword at the same time of Olympiad Time, as all can see you and all others US boys dont have any problem to log and participate to the oly ... So let's have fun all together. To me there's absolutly no serious reason to not let playing everybody.

    Swords already start at exactly the same time as olympiad lol.  both start at 4pm est. 

    Another key difference you are overlooking here though is that Olympiad is on the weekends and not when most NA/SA people are working.

  4. 3 minutes ago, Leone said:

    so is pretty funny that from all 60+ people from ''top clans'' only 2 pick up the swords on daily basis .All those 60+ people are from same ally that just beg for share 100m for being there doing nothing but this is another story

    The healthy server is when  both sides can have access to play for swords too. Who is picking up the swords 4 times per week and take the bloods for themselves and give the leftovers to the 60+ppl wants to win by any means possible. From those who are so active during so called mass pvp who got the bloods?

    It's not hard to understand when you consider that when a sword drops you usually only have a couple of seconds before it is retrieved.  When time scales are so short, being 1 or 2 seconds faster than your competition will result in victory almost every single time.

    • Haha 1
  5. Furthermore, as far as the accusations of using programs to gain an advantage in picking up the swords, these are direct attacks at L0RELEI and myself.  As I have stated many many times, we aren't using anything more than fast fingers, fast pcs, and a fast connection so I too would welcome a GM presence at swords but I fear even this would not prove our innocence as the GM would see we are innocent and end up taking no action (exactly as they should).  But these same people who are wanting the GM there will simply twist the story to say the GM's are working with us or some other variant of that story. All of these accusations go back to the root if this post as well, that is the people who currently aren't doing well at swords would rather blame others and try to twist the game to their will than accept that they are being beaten and look at themselves and what they could change for ways to succeed.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  6. Cursed swords are supposed to be a mass pvp event and the times they are active represent the periods of highest server activity which encourages as many to participate as possible.

    There are currently 60+ people, just from the top clans, who participate in the cursed swords on a daily basis and easily 20-30 more who are active from these same clans but choose not to participate because they don't handle losing well.  If the time were to change I can 100% guarantee that this number of active people will go down significantly.  

    This thread is nothing more than the loud minority trying to bend the majority of players to their will so that they have a better chance of taking control of the sword drops. They have no interest in healthy server that allows as many people as possible to participate, they only care about winning by any means possible.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  7. I am perfectly on topic, and even agree with your post on this particular subject. 

    Just making sure people see your motives for posting this now, when you didn't give a damn about it before. This post combined with the recent shouts in game have made your motives are clear as day. 

    Greed destroys clans faster than anything so I hope the other 99% of your clan aren't being driven by the same lines of thought that you are.

    • Like 1
  8. We posted this topic years ago, when ms was starting to win dragons via click war.  We had lots of support then as well, but no action.  It's hilarious that of all people pushing for it now, the guy who doesn't even pvp is the one posting it.  

    Ando i'm glad you're finally posting something that isn't completely trash, but you're also beyond transparent man.  The only reason you care about this at all is you see a chance for opportunity, and your greed is kicking into over drive.

    While we're at it, lets turn Giran into a pvp zone.  PvP for the most over priced shops.  There is something Ando would actually be good at.

    • Like 3
  9. 3 minutes ago, Endlesswar said:

    How the hell could they know that the teleport point was intended to be unaccesdible? It has been used since ages and nobody ever complained.

    how could they know? easy. its called thinking. use your brain. what other active siege zone can you use a myteleport into? 

     

    4 minutes ago, Endlesswar said:

    If they had know it was an exploit i dont think 40 players top geared would have risked it... or you think they are crazy msybe

    desperate people do desperate things... not much more to say.

    I suspect they were purely baking on power in numbers, combined with some group think of a few individuals influencing the others to think it was ok.

    MS: "Well I know they banned people in the past for this, but surely they wont ban us all, I mean, look how much money we spend."

  10. just let the topic die... there is no arguing with divekio.  He is too stubborn to see any perspective but his own twisted reality. 

    there have been some valid points made, but in the end, it comes down to 1 of 2 things... either bullies being uphappy that they cannot bully as effectively as they wish, or players recently banned and grasping at straws and lashing out at others in an effort to blame others.

  11. 44 minutes ago, ReaperGG said:

    the place we were teleporting to was Aden Territory and NOT Aden Castle!

    but yet, it was in the middle of an active siege ground.  so lets think about this more....

    a simple coding glitch allowed a very small region of the siege field to register as aden territory.  

    using a glitch to your advantage is an exploit.

    the penalties for using terrain exploits were well defined due to your clan, and yet you decided to ignore them.

     

    ive done the math and made the arguments... justice was served and now you all are crying like children that you received the same exact punishment that precedent dictated would happen. 

  12. On 6/23/2020 at 1:20 PM, voo said:

    I have only been online a day and heard a ban just happened.  does it really make sense to ban people for teleporting tho? 

    honestly, no it doesn't... not without context anyways...

    the context youre missing is as follows:

    • ms reported a player for using myteleport to access the top of a tree that was previously accessed with a wyvren (no different than the roof of parnassus that we've all had for years).
    • nc somehow decided that this player's location was indeed an exploit, since she was holding a blood sword, and she recieved a perma ban for it
      • this ban was later reversed after the player fully explained to them how she got there (NC was clueless)
      • its also worth mentioning how dumb this is, since you can still hide in castles, forts, ect.
    • following all of this, nc disabled blood swords for a month and a half and made numerous posts, both in game and on forums, about not using my teleports to participate in terrain exploits.

    that brings us to the current bans... even though all these rules were put in place at the request of ms, they thought the rules didnt apply to them and used my teleport to port into the middle of an active siege ground.  now they are mad because they got the same treatment that the previously mentioned player recieved.

    enjoy!

     

  13.  

    1 minute ago, Dagger said:

    Simple example;
    14 man clan joins PVP = Can PVP freely.

    15 man clan joins PVP = Can PVP with fear of war, if they have a declaration going.

    The war system was changed to force wars to activate on 5 deaths for a reason.

    This is an exploit of the current system as it is meant to gain an unfair advantage, this is obvious to anyone and you cant really argue against it.
     

    It definitely needs looking into as this old system feels very outdated at this point.

    Dont care for the drama between MS//Nova/LB/FS/ProPVE and every other small clan people jump into, just my two cents on this specific matter.
    /Znipo

     

    i would not be opposed to an overhaul of the wars system, because yes, it does seem a little dated, but forcing people into situations where they are unable to defend themselves from griefers isn't the answer.

    just with minimal thought off the top of my head, the easiest fix might look like this:

    • no more 5 kills automatically triggering a war,
    • 1 way war just means the clan with a declaration up will take war death penalty, but the side with no war takes full deaths when they die
    • 2 way war remains unchanged
    • clans can declare on any other clan
    • Like 2
  14. 9 minutes ago, Karigan said:

    The 14 man clan mechanic was one of a couple things that were put into to place to protect against the big clan that goes around declaring wars on smaller clans and halting progression on a one sided server.  The other was that clans did not have to accept war, however, the bigger clans have found ways around that by forcing players to kill others in a similar method as shown in the video regarding the PK bug.  The only thing protecting the smaller clans right now from getting zerged out of existence is the 14 man clan rule and you guys want to remove that too. LOL 

    Why are you so scared of these 14 man clans if yours is so much bigger?  Truth is, this stops you from setting your toons on top of their hunting spots and KSing without fear of repercussions and wars starting.  They can now defend themselves from this tactic.    The 14 man clan doesn't prevent you from PVPing them, it prevents you from griefing and the new PK system makes you take a second thought before you go mass PKing like you were also want to do.  As for sieges, if they have 14 man clans on siege grounds they're aoeing each other.  If your clan is bigger you should have an advantage.  Why are you scared of 14 people? 

    well said karigan. thanks. 

    there are large disadvantages to being in a 14 man clan as well, with the only real advantage being to prevent griefing.  

    if we didnt have such a toxic community to deal with, this would be a non-issue, but unfortunately that isnt the reality we face.

  15. 3 minutes ago, Divekio said:

    Yourself just pk'ed our members as today, GM can check your logs so dont talk about toxicity, when you are abusing a system created to help new players and clans. You are a game mechanics exploiter and we wait for severe actions against players who do so .

    sure, check the logs... the last time i killed you was when you were griefing Gicobbe when he was xping in swamps.

  16. Literally the only thing you are asking for is the ability to force us to fight back, ALSO KNOWN AS BULLYING.... 

    As it stands, we're on equal ground... If you flag on me, i can flag back if i chose, or not. If i Flag on you, you can flag back on me if you chose, or not. 

    A 1 way war, that doesnt allow people to fight back, and encourages bullying sounds like a bigger exploit than giving all people involved a choice in the matter.

    • Like 2
  17. lol... has it ever occurred to you that not all clans want wars?  We don't go around hunting people, and don't really look for trouble at all. This is a game mechanic that allows people to defend themselves from toxic players, of which Chronos has/had plenty. anyone who wants this change is just mad because they're unable to grief us freely. 

    Divekio and MS: "Please GM's allow us to grief anyone we want" 

  18. NC set the precedent when they banned Audge for several days for using My Teleport to teleport into a tree that was previously accessed with a wyvren.  All Audge did was the same thing we have all been doing for years: using my teleport to reach a hard to reach location.  

    These actions go above and beyond anything that Audge did because it is a well known fact that you aren't supposed to be able to port into an active siege zone.  Not only is it a clear exploit, but it was a planned, deliberate, and desperate attempt to gain an advantage by any means necessary, even though there have been numerous warning by the GM's both on this forum and in game as well.  The fact that basically the entire clan had this jump saved shows that it was a part of their defense strategy well before the siege even started, and they even broke down their own castle wall to make this exploit work even better for them.

    It really mystifies me how MS was able to convince so many of its members that this was not only acceptable, but also a good idea.  I guess desperation does strange things to people though.

    Personally, i think the most fitting punishment would be to give all characters involved a 3 day ban starting on 7/3/2020 and not allow them to attend next siege since they don't seem to think rules apply to them. 

     

    • Like 3
  19. +++++ Ive been saying ti for a while... there needs to be something implemented.  Personally, Instead of the BSOE lock, i think a permanent Rez lock is more punishing and a better fit, or even both a rez and bsoe lock for extreme pkers.  

    This system would be a HUGE improvement over what we have now though and needs to be implemented ASAP.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...