Jump to content

beleaua

Adventurers
  • Posts

    487
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by beleaua

  1. 3 hours ago, Devoid said:

    Well, they are learning from Innova just fine

    That's the thing, they don't. Innova told before, they won't put p2w items in the shop like Korea. Even said on stream before putting the store up. The main point of the shop is to help everyone getting to 3rd class faster, as the shop is mostly for anyone under 76. Those are old servers, they need that. Unless you think that scrolls that cost 0.01 dollars are p2w, scrolls that are mostly unnecessary or replaced by ingame meanings. They also introduced brooches but unlike in Korea, those are not in the shop, only by ingame meanings.

    I know you think it's a matter of time but it's not. Look at the live servers here, same f2p as Innova, yet NCWest never introduced in all these years the meaning of obtaining brooch jewels and other p2w items by ingame options like on Innova.

  2. On 9/30/2018 at 7:54 PM, NecroFillin said:

    I think SE is not legit here, you can get Empover or Vampiric just from fish stew 

    aren't those stews like level 1 or something?

    On 10/1/2018 at 12:54 PM, Lost said:

    Dont listen to people telling you to roll mage+elder+bd because you will run oom in 5 minutes without at least 2 rechargers and even 2 (with clarity) aren't enough to go non stop. If you plan on rolling a mage then you absolutely need 2 rechargers (se+ee would be the best choice).

    if it's anything like the past then i didn't need 2. a short break for body to mind was enough when both ran oom. with 2 is better but seems like you would rather take a better buffer or maybe a sws.

  3. 28 minutes ago, L2Vet said:

    Oh what a surprise, you're not even in North America but you're still going to troll the forums shilling for a game-ruining addition and act like "it's not a big deal to you but actually looping macros are really good and prevent botting!"...

    I said it once and I'll say it again, I THINK WHAT THIS BOILS DOWN TO, is that YOU'RE JUST LAZY. Notice the words "I THINK"? That means I'm speculating not stating a fact, so maybe take that into account before getting your panties twisted. You can claim you don't care whether looping macros are added or not, but you're clearly suggesting that looping macros are a good addition to the game. Actions speak louder than words, which I think makes my speculation reasonable. You're just lazy, and despite what you're saying, you're advocating for a feature that will allow you to press one button and go to bed while the game plays itself. Gtfo to your own server with stupid ideas like that.

    you're just speculating even more. when did i ever troll the forum? it seems like the old forum is removed but you could have search for me there and see. you again quote something i have never said. i'm not phased by any of the options because it's not in my power to change things and i'm not a kid to believe  and overreact to everything they say. this is nc. since many years ago, when did they ever started listening to players or do anything that it's not in their interest? since when it's wrong to not be from NA? if you were around for some time you would have known the majority of players left in this game are not from NA.

    i didn't criticize you for the lazy part just the others. before telling me i'm lazy  you said  "What kind of clown world do you live in where you fix botting by literally legitimizing bots? lmfao! ", while i haven't even made that statement where i want looping to stay. later you said "You want to progress in this game by pressing 1 button and walking away while the game plays itself for hours on end. This is ridiculous.". again assuming i'm for either of the options. then "What you're asking for is utterly RIDICULOUS and your reasoning is similarly RIDICULOUS. ", while i haven't asked absolutely anything.

    further more, you don't even know how i play the game. i'm telling you now, old school by being active and with clan, not by afk macro. only if i need short break. yes, you really found the guy guilty for making the macro stay in this game and you really solved all the problems by attacking me. congrats!

    question is, why do you still continue? you overreacted and were also wrong by attacking me on something i didn't say but yet you continue.

  4. 8 minutes ago, L2Vet said:

    The guy who can't even use a forum and speaks in broken English is calling me an idiot. I'm truly hurt. My response suited what you wrote just fine, you obviously lack the communication skills to comprehend what I said.

    not my fault  the forum stopped responding when i pressed submit reply and it actually committed the reply but it didn't close the window. i also haven't learned english in school nor that is my native language. you understood just fine. if you were around this forum for more time you would have known that most players left in this game are from europe.  keep barking at the wrong tree for making assumption about things i've never said.  the lack of communication skills are on your side, for spewing garbage not even related to what i said and making ridiculous assumptions.

  5. 3 hours ago, L2Vet said:

    Yeah, bots are bad... they're also easy to detect and ban. The problem with bots is that in the past, NC has unofficially allowed botting by rarely enforcing the rule against botting, even though it's incredibly easy to detect when someone is botting and therefore also easy to ban all botters in a short period of time. The solution to the bot problem is not to make botting legit via ingame looping macros, as you're suggesting, but to actually enforce the rule against bots. What kind of clown world do you live in where you fix botting by literally legitimizing bots? lmfao! You fix the bot problem by banning bots.

    If the rule against botting is actually enforced, and it could be enforced extremely easily, why then should looping macros be in the game? No one will bot if it means they get banned in <1 week of botting (and this is quite realistic), so removing looping macros wouldn't cause people to start botting, it would cause them to start playing the game as it was intended to be played.

    I think what this boils down to, is that you're lazy. You want to progress in this game by pressing 1 button and walking away while the game plays itself for hours on end. This is ridiculous. Don't ruin the game for others because you don't want to play it. What you're asking for is utterly RIDICULOUS and your reasoning is similarly RIDICULOUS. 

    you're literally a clown yourself for not reading what i wrote, see the  message you quoted.

    rest of it are your assumption and you make fun of your own assumptions.

    did i say to legitimize bots? no. did i say i want to play with one button and walk away? no. how i am ruining your game if i'm pretty sure i'm not gonna play it for more than observing the game at start?  in the end i didn't ask for anything so all the ridiculous part is all yourself.

    Quote

    Back then there were full parties of bots everywhere, paying $15 a month and still not cared about being banned. In many ways those are more dangerous than looping macros. Ban looping macros and players will use real bots which are worse. Keep looping macros and players will switch to looping macros to stay legit. With looping macros you will mostly see parties of 3 because most will use just one pc while bots bypass this limit. I don't care what they will do, keep or remove loop macros, just giving some possible alternatives. Btw nostromo and other automatic macros were allowed as long as you were at the pc.

     

  6. 7 hours ago, L2Vet said:

    What "macro's" could run on 9 separate clients, while minimized, at the same time, back in classic? Nothing like this was in classic L2. Normal macros weren't introduced until C3 or something. Wtf are you smoking? Anything capable of what auto-looping is capable of was bannable back in real classic times.

    Back then there were full parties of bots everywhere, paying $15 a month and still not cared about being banned. In many ways those are more dangerous than looping macros. Ban looping macros and players will use real bots which are worse. Keep looping macros and players will switch to looping macros to stay legit. With looping macros you will mostly see parties of 3 because most will use just one pc while bots bypass this limit. I don't care what they will do, keep or remove loop macros, just giving some possible alternatives. Btw nostromo and other automatic macros were allowed as long as you were at the pc.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...