oscar2132
-
Posts
30 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by oscar2132
-
-
love this topic, u start comin'to sense, so, the old problem of 14ppl clan exploit come up again, if there would be a war, wouldn't that be fixin the prob ?
coz otherwise the way u go Ando is in the end u gone ask for pvp zone in town also
no, just make wars possible, and problems solve.
-
to have the right to set foot on a pvp zone a clan must be able to receive a war declaration, the honorable way
otherwise the sole purpose of pvp fight it's a lie, not a fair fight, and a scheme to gain advantages in situation like territory siege and/or cursed swords
clans who want the dodge a clan war by all means should not engage in any pvp fight !
or why pvp only when convenient? a war it is a war and should be carried out on full time scale at full capacity until one side surrender !
u wanna dodge war ? stay aside, you no need pvp, u no need a territory u no need bloodstained weps
update the rules, make Lineage iI the game we deserve, the game we sacrificed years for !
-
4 minutes ago, Varhalla said:
Change the game so that 5 kills does not start off a war. Make it so that if one clan declares war on another clan that the clan being warred must accept the war for the war to be started. If the clan being warred rejects the war invitation then there is no war. This is so easy and fair to everyone. In this way the top-tier over-geared pvp clans won't need to fear lowbies in small clans.
This solution will bring much joy to many players in the game who could then participate in castle sieges without the fear of having a war on them just because they wanted to have some fun at a castle siege.
I'm sure many more players would then participate and have more fun then they are having now in the game.
to have the right to set foot on a pvp zone a clan must be able to receive a war declaration, the honorable way
otherwise the sole purpose of pvp fight it's a lie, not a fair fight, and a scheme to gain advantages in situation like territory siege and/or cursed swords
clans who want the dodge a clan war by all means should not engage in any pvp fight !
or why pvp only when convenient? a war it is a war and should be carried out on full time scale at full capacity until one side surrender !
u wanna dodge war ? stay aside, you no need pvp, u no need a territory u no need bloodstained weps
update the rules, make Lineage iI the game we deserve, the game we sacrificed years for !
-
the game has both pvp and pve content, and wars are old as the world, i wanna be able to declare war to a clan that has less than 14 members and they pk me or my friends, or for any other reason, and i can't.
isn't this harassment? isn't this cheating? NCwest should update the rules to the actual situation !
and if it is to stay like this, if NCwest choose to take no action in this matter, it has to be set a price at least, for dodging the wars, and that should be no territory for this type of clans, not even fortress or war clan halls, and they should say thanks a trillion times for a town clan hall.
-
the game has both pvp and pve content, and wars are old as the world, i wanna be able to declare war to a clan that has less than 14 members and they pk me or my friends, or for any other reason, and i can't.
isn't this harassment? isn't this cheating? NCwest should update the rules to the actual situation !
and if it is to stay like this, if NCwest choose to take no action in this matter, it has to be set a price at least, for dodging the wars, and that should be no territory for this type of clans, not even fortress or war clan halls, and they should say thanks a trillion times for a town clan hall.
-
1
-
-
you can't have everything when there are soo many clans, you can't avoid war and then go take a castle, is not fair.
you choose to not pvp, then u don't need a castle, castles should be for all the large active clans willing to fight fair for it !
-
1
-
-
to make the fight fair, because there are only 9 castles and many clans with active ppl that needs one , the clans that choose to not pvp should not be allowed to own a castle
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Degus said:
dunno how you come up w/ exploit, surely not clear as day, makes no sense actually, to me. show me where anything change. wtf does having a castle have to do with wars in that sense, if it's a real clan and took it, that's even better then the 40 member clan taking it, ever try? I have. i don't get your logic... why do I have to pvp by your rules? pvp on siege field and bullying low level clans by sending unnecessary war are by far 2 different things, imo
castle siege was meant for everyone to participate, shouldn't effect the next 2 weeks game play cuz some 1 needs to see his name blue by killing some 1 7 levels lower and afk wasting real money and time.
perhaps your sentences don't make sense amigo, some may try to read and decodify your lines, and the result will be the same every time, senseless rage ... you should pay me for anger management lessons ...
no war no siege, simple, NCwest is called to answer, not angry boogers
-
6 minutes ago, Degus said:
Declaring a war
- A clan level 5 or above consisting of at least15 characters can declare a war to another clan. To accept that war, the second clan should also meet the same requirements.
- At the same time a clan can challenge up to 30 clans, but it can accept any amount of challenges.
- You can declare a war using a chat command or clan management interface.
- The clan someone declared war against can use their clan information window to see the info about clan wars, like how many times their clan members were killed and the time before declining the challenge before the war has begun.
-
War begins when the clan someone declared war against:
- accepted it by pressing a special button in their clan management menu;
- killed in PvP/PK 5 or more characters from the clan who's declared war (the opponents should not be in a chaotic state);
- if a character dies from reflected damage, such death is not eligible for death counter to start a clan war;
- death is eligible for such counter if the clan someone declared war against has delivered the lethal blow on that character; or it has don 90% of the damage. However, if someone unrelated to the war has delivered the final blow, such death doesn't count.
this is a rule as old as the game, 16 years ? many things changed in the mean time like macro hunting and pk system, it's time for clan war rules tu be updated also, protecting both parts, those who want pve and those who want pvp, makeing it clear and transparent for all, no place for cheating !!! and then there will be no cheat !!! at this moment a clan that avoid war can attend to siege and get a castle, this is exploit, as clear as day light!
-
it should be as simple as that dear NCwest !
this is a clear exploit !
you don't wanna pvp ? of my! no worries, but then no siege either, right ? in a place designed for clan vs clan combat, like territory siege, clans who don't wanna pvp should not be able to take a castle!
there is a price for everything? will this time the price be paid ? the community deserve and answear, NCwest !
-
1
-
-
can someone take a shower without getting wet? I'm afraid not. then how does a clan that cannot have wars being able to siege? where is all about pvp, this is a siege, a clan war another for a territory
so, the solution should be simple, a clan that doesn't want wars, should not be able to attend siege.
-
1
-
-
21 minutes ago, Aleira said:
NC set the precedent when they banned Audge for several days for using My Teleport to teleport into a tree that was previously accessed with a wyvren. All Audge did was the same thing we have all been doing for years: using my teleport to reach a hard to reach location.
These actions go above and beyond anything that Audge did because it is a well known fact that you aren't supposed to be able to port into an active siege zone. Not only is it a clear exploit, but it was a planned, deliberate, and desperate attempt to gain an advantage by any means necessary, even though there have been numerous warning by the GM's both on this forum and in game as well. The fact that basically the entire clan had this jump saved shows that it was a part of their defense strategy well before the siege even started, and they even broke down their own castle wall to make this exploit work even better for them.
It really mystifies me how MS was able to convince so many of its members that this was not only acceptable, but also a good idea. I guess desperation does strange things to people though.
Personally, i think the most fitting punishment would be to give all characters involved a 3 day ban starting on 7/3/2020 and not allow them to attend next siege since they don't seem to think rules apply to them.
not that they ask for ban, deperate attempt indeed, but they ask for it in specific dates ...what else would u desire pope, perhaps a +50 dragon bow ? Juji, could u please be so kind and execute the order for our poor victimized pope :))))))))))
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, Felinty said:
To be honest, FS members used to have that My Teleport spot saved.
However, all of us deleted that jump spot a day after Hime posted on March 6th that we should delete exploit My Teleport Bookmarks because we respect rules.
Please feel free to check any FS members’ my teleport logs.
Too much cheaters in this game lolz.
that's why u log off when Juji log in, is he a cheater ?
-
-
On 4/25/2020 at 2:34 AM, GottWillEs said:
the casino is not so bad to be honest.... at least it free to play casion ( no cash involved here)
you got that a bit wrong my friend, because vitality costs are quite substantially
-
1 hour ago, Quenia said:
Just my opinion of what's happening!
hahahahabhahaha
-
5 hours ago, Pope said:
+1.... this whole situation is just the most ridiculous thing that i have read in a very long time.
It really seems like NC realized they made a horrible mistake, and instead of admitting it, they are now just trying to make up 'rules' to cover their ass.
people have been using wyvrens and myteleports for years, and now all of a sudden its a bannable offence? Get bleeping real. Most of the people in here spend years pvping on the roof of Parn and countless other similar locations. If it was ok then, then why is it all of a sudden a problem?
NC gave us all the means to accomplish everything that has happened, but now we're the ones in the wrong for using it?
6 hours ago, Auburn said:Yeah, massive amounts of NCoin purchases give you the shield of protection from ban hammers.
Pope, buy more bro, buy more, and maybe you'll be safe, listen Auburn, he knows it
-
1 hour ago, Juji said:
We are already aware of the continued latency and are now in contact with Dev to find a solution. I will keep you updated.
the only certainty here is that the ones in charge with the server performance and their imediat superiors are beyond any shame and/or idiocy ( i'll have to keep it polite or they will remove the post and ban me, even if i wish i could speak a bit more freely about... )
-
1
-
-
what is the bloody point of exp event without full potential of time zones, what ever you do, you better enable the full potential of the time zones, it will be the only thing that will distract people ( from all the fail you had) and keep them busy
Make Dragon zone a PVP zone
in General Live Discussion
Posted · Edited by oscar2132
who are u to judge? i say 14 ppl clans are greed, not letting bigger clans to help their mates to gear up