iHyperlite
-
Posts
1,484 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
42
Posts posted by iHyperlite
-
-
1 minute ago, JOSEPH said:
If it is abuse, the player is by mistake of the game obtained 70Billions in 1 sec and they repeat it. and one who plays normal Thing gets 1 billion a day or less.
theyre re-setting the server, no one is getting anything tho...
-
3 minutes ago, ErrorFatal said:
Yes, but if you know that something is wrong, the right thing to do is to report the BUG and not take advantage of it.
it was reported immidiately by multiple people.
are you stating they should ban ppl and leave the servers un-rolled back?
-
Just now, Zyrax3S said:
yes ncwest fault but why all the time same people do the exploit befor all to notice?
there are a handful of players who have all the adena on each server. these players also have top items.
buying items on the AH that the masses turned in for isnt a bug, exploit, or anything. its a poorly ran maintenance and a server roll back is fine.
if the person who made a stage 3 on the claws is banned, so would every single person who tried to enchant after maint, regardless if they know of the bug or not.
bit rediculous expectation for bans to be issued on that.
-
1 minute ago, xxbutcherxx said:
Hope is not because I spent 11 royal gold tickets to make my bow +21, so @Juji how can this be resolved? why do we have to pay for your mistakes and the server exploit people?
u will get your adena / dragon slayers / golds back and your original weapon. please try again and i wish u luck.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, ErrorFatal said:
I understand that if someone abuses a BUG the company in this case NCWest should ban the account for abusing this BUG, or will they let the abusers remain free and without punishment?
how is it abusing a bug if the npc to give items was giving the wrong items? this is ncsoft's fault, not the users.
a server roll back is appropriate here, not bans.
-
4 minutes ago, xxbutcherxx said:
I made my bow + 21 after maintenance from +18, I hope is still +21 when I log back in the game. @Juji
that will be a negative sir
-
46 minutes ago, Juji said:
Live servers will be down for emergency maintenance beginning Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 12:25 p.m. The servers will be unavailable for approximately 5 hours.
With this maintenance:
- Rollback of the Live service from before servers opened after maintenance
will the server transfers that were processed remain?
will all ncoin purchases be reset?
-
1 minute ago, Draecke said:
and a 20% discount up to the same ncoin amount spent during the event weeks on event items.
-
2 minutes ago, Degus said:
So did they nerf our version and now we are seeing what the rewards should of been? That makes it even more disgusting.
this is japan/taiwan's rewards. everone there has stage 3 and 20 cloaks and stage 6 god jewels
now we know why...
and yet we all still sit here and spend money to get screwed...
-
if they leave as is, dont roll back, dont let the masses participate and buy chests as well to obtain new rewards, ill quit too.
with the money i spent the last 2 weeks on the event, i would have made stage 2 dragon daggers for the same cost.
thats shit if they do nothing
-
2
-
-
the silence is deafening
-
1
-
1
-
-
+10 reward is a destro scroll for ancient kingdom cloak 15-18 / +12 is a dragon claw
like, i just spent a ton enchanting this past week and would have done it all dif if i knew we'd get these rewards today.
-
1
-
-
-
@Juji u may wanna check event stick turn in roll back some stuff... weapon values just totally changed...
or re-enable the event purchase and let us all try fairly. letting ppl keep these items is def not a cool outcome to the current situation.
-
1 hour ago, Degus said:
If they could fix the game so when your set to atk only monsters you can't be forced to hit a player, 90% of the real problems being discussed here go away, the rest, (not allowing 14 man clans to compete) is rubbish and will never be considered. imo, best fix is both sides must click to agree if can't fix the fore flag issue.
both sides click to agree is extremely carebear, sorry. that is a poor idea and doesnt function in any way like how a real life war or in game war works, regardless of declaration. if the clan that was declared against wants to fight back and flag and kill, they should also then accept the war status as attacking back is also an act of war.
you dont get to freely kill ppl who declare on you and never accept bro, come on...
your solution also doesnt address the lack of detag penalty, which is why everyone moves to 14 man clans.
you're main focus is staying warless with 15+ man clans to pve freely without any consequences or effort from your members to not attack ppl. its kind of the opposite of what this thread is pushing to do.
-
7 hours ago, Juji said:
Yes, we will re-enable the server transfers after 6/16.
core is getting the neutral zone update, maybe this is prep for us to get it early like the ketra update?
-
2 hours ago, Hime said:
- Server Transfers will be temporarily unavailable from June 8 through June 16.
You will re-enable server transfers after the 16th? for both servers to freely go to the other server?
-
2 hours ago, Connex said:
there is so much gear that you need that contributes to the total amount of damage you do that you can have a +20 weapon and still not be able to kill mobs at your level.
belts, artifacts, accessories, jewels, brooch jewels, enchanted skills, agathions, talismans, circlets, more circlets and so onU got up to speed fast
Welcome back to this lovely addiction we have.
-
18 hours ago, Degus said:
Well, your kinda right, too toxic to go back and step by step. Give my opinion on a few ya just stated though. Droping clan and retagging, I agree, should be way longer, not really part of the war system though, strategy. Starting a war w/ non-target aoe's forcing a war, again, not a war system problem, it's a game problem. I won't take offense because I think a lot are trying to put their own problems into a clan war problem. You think it's right to MAKE a clan accept a war? Ask yourself that question. Black and white question, yes or no, should a clan be forced to war another clan they don't want to, that's what I want to hear you answer. If you scroll back, you'll see people saying, no siege unless clan war, no dragon's unless clan war, F that! I agree there a flaws in the war system, but not as many as these people are crying about. Remove protection if clan is too small, that's the 1 and only way to safe from level 120 griefers w/ 100K$ of gear griefing 112's because they have nothing left to do (buy). Clan war should be a 2 sided decision, not forced.
People complain about non target aoes opening a war in the current system. You say that's a game problem, not a clan war problem. OK, fine. Call it whatever you want, but they are related, and can be discussed as such.
To your direct question: if I declare on a clan, and they kill my clan members 5 times, they should open war. I am fine the the declared status and 5 kills.
The detag issue is my only complaint in this thread. I think the war declaration system is fine. I think the 5 kills to open a war is fine. I dislike people flagging with non target aoe's, but I'm sort of whatever on that.
The stuff about dragons, etc. All dragons should be pvp zones like at swords and siege.
-
13 hours ago, DorfL2 said:
Guy's,
SAYHA class is so bad? Can't kill at all?
Or It just so weak that nobody play? I dun see any such class in any party. Dead class?
Thought of trying out, not sure whether worth the effort.
It seems like a boring class to me, but I typically dislike hybrid classes. I think it's good in pvp, but not so much in pve.
Maybe no one plays one correct, I dunno.
-
7 hours ago, Degus said:
@iHyperliteA million times, but what's the actual issue? Clan's that don't want a war should be forced into it because the other clan spent a lot of money and wanna see blue names flash by?
Are you asking in general or to my posts? I have stated pretty clearly what I think the problem is.
There is no reason to stay in a clan of more than 14 people in the current state of the game. There is no benefit to holding a war and no penalty for ending or detaging. People detag right after siege, and join 14- man clans to pve for 13 days, only to retag up for siege, rinse, repeat.
This is not how the clan and war system is supposed to work.
There is also the aspect of non target aoe's inadvertently starting wars because the 5 kill mechanism is abused by some people.
I have suggested a couple of things to combat these, as have other people.
1 solution is making the penalty for leaving a clan on lvl 110+ people 14 days. This would prevent them from sieging under their main tag on the defense siege 2 weeks later.
Another solution is to remove the 14 man protection of war status for a clan.
Another solution is to revamp how wars are accepted and started.
Another solution is to make non target aoe's behave according to how the in game target selection is set to (monster, pc, taunt) to prevent inadvertent flagging.
I don't honestly see how anyone can read through the non toxic comments in this thread and still wonder what we are discussing, no offense m8.
-
-
On 6/2/2021 at 9:47 AM, CrossEyedMary said:
WTB Ultra-Grade KALIEL bracelet with 8 slots!
dude i need more than 6 for sure...
-
1 hour ago, Dawe said:
So people just stand there, and not 1-shot enemy CC Leader?
and go red, then they attack your red and you cant do anything about it. they swap cc leader, their problem is solved. so are you going to pk all 40+ toons? and how will you prevent them from res'ing themselves after you pk?
thats alot of karma....
edit: i think you missed my comment where 1 person is driving 20+ toons on 1 pc. swapping cc leader is no issue.
Emergency Maintenance: Wednesday, June 9, 2021
in Archive
Posted
restore abuse is totally different than what happened today.