Jump to content

Sayha's Talisman Exalted and Venir 10 to 12


TazBag

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, xQuiuvat said:

It has always been venir 12 here in NA

You are wrong, it was changed without announcement after the maintenance, even the description remained with lvl. 10 on the official site: https://www.lineage2.com/news/17th-anniversary-store-update. I don't have any screenshot, but it was the same in game.

Why would you post wrong information on the forum without any verification at all?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Akashha said:

You are wrong, it was changed without announcement after the maintenance, even the description remained with lvl. 10 on the official site: https://www.lineage2.com/news/17th-anniversary-store-update. I don't have any screenshot, but it was the same in game.

Why would you post wrong information on the forum without any verification at all?

True, was 10, not was 12, i make post on forum because i was sure 100% was 10.

Wait a reply from GM or someone 😃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Blessed Sayha's Talisman needed venir lvl10 for skill power 2% and skill cd 2%. i remember this because i bought the armor pack and i was searching to buy a venir lvl10 during 17th anniversary event and i found for 1.2b in AH.

Now it needs venir lvl12 after so many people bought the armor pack.

Gz @Juji, @Himeand @LIMEfor not informing us with the ninja patches and all the lower enchant rates from the latest dragon weapon "event".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Misleading consumers is considered an unfair market practice, the use of which is prohibited. Under the influence of false information, the consumer is exposed to the purchase of a product or service, which he would not have done if he had known about the actual terms of the offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A market practice is considered a misleading action if
this action in any way causes or may cause the average consumer to take a contractual decision that he would not otherwise have made.

In particular, a misleading act may be:

1) disseminating false information;

2) disseminating true information in a manner that may be misleading;

3) activities related to the placing of the product on the market, which may be misleading in terms of products or their packaging, trademarks, trade names or other indications individualising the entrepreneur or its products, in particular comparative advertising within the meaning of art. 16 sec. 3 of the Act of April 16, 1993 on Combating Unfair Competition (Journal of Laws of 2003, No. 153, item 1503, as amended);

4) failure to comply with the code of good practice, to which the entrepreneur has voluntarily joined, if the entrepreneur informs, as part of a market practice, that he is bound by the code of good practice.

A misleading action may, in particular, concern:

1) the existence of the product, its type or availability;

2) product characteristics, in particular its geographical or commercial origin, quantity, quality, method of manufacture, ingredients, date of production, shelf life, possibilities and expected results of product use, additional equipment, tests and results of tests or inspections carried out on the product, permits, awards or product awards, risks and benefits of the product;

3) the entrepreneur's obligations related to the product, including service and complaint procedures, delivery, necessary services and parts;

4) consumer rights, in particular the right to repair or replace the product with a new one, or the right to reduce the price or to withdraw from the contract;

5) the price, the method of calculating the price or the existence of a special price advantage;

6) type of sale, reasons for the use of market practice by the entrepreneur, statements and symbols regarding direct or indirect sponsorship, information on the economic or legal situation of the entrepreneur or his representative, including his name and surname (name) and assets, qualifications, status, permits held , membership or affiliation, and industrial and intellectual property rights or awards and distinctions.

When assessing whether a market practice is misleading by action, all its elements and the circumstances of placing the product on the market, including its presentation, should be taken into account.

A market practice is considered a misleading omission if
it omits essential information that the average consumer needs to make a contract decision and thus causes or may cause the average consumer to take a contract decision that he would not otherwise have made. In case of doubt, essential information is information that an entrepreneur using market practice is obliged to provide to consumers on the basis of separate provisions.

A misleading omission may be in particular:

1) concealing or failing to provide in a clear, unambiguous or timely manner relevant information about the product;

2) failure to disclose the commercial purpose of the practice, if it does not clearly result from the circumstances and if it causes or may cause the average consumer to take a decision regarding the contract that he would not have taken otherwise.

In the case of a proposal to purchase a product, important information is in particular:

1) essential features of the product in so far as it is appropriate for a given means of communicating with consumers and the product;

2) name, surname (name) and address of the entrepreneur (registered office) and the entrepreneur on behalf of which he acts;

3) the price inclusive of taxes or, where the nature of the product does not reasonably allow the price to be calculated in advance, the manner in which the price is calculated, as well as any additional charges for transport, delivery or postal services, or, where these are calculated in advance charges is not reasonably possible to know that such additional costs may arise;

4) arrangements regarding the method of payment, delivery or performance of the product and the complaint handling procedure;

5) information on the existence of the right to withdraw from the contract or to terminate the contract, if such a right results from the act or contract.

When assessing whether the market practice is misleading by omission,
all its elements and the circumstances in which the product is placed on the market, including its presentation, should be taken into account. Where spatial or temporal limitations result from the specificity of the means of communication with consumers used for a given market practice, these limitations and all measures taken by the trader to make information available to consumers in a different way shall be taken into account when assessing whether information has been omitted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the bonus never worked with a venir 10, that really was just a dumb typo which got fixed

is it annoying and a tad misleading sure but it was like that for the real sayha talismans so one could have expected it to be a typo right away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...