Brafrod Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 I have a question for MS ally. The latest siege, it is apparent MS has complete control of most of the castles in Chronos, if not all. I don't think any one can deny the MS supremacy on Chronos. My question is now that you control the castle siege, is that what you wanted? Is the castle siege aspect of Lineage 2 more fun for you with no activity? The last several sieges, activity steadily decreased, APEX no long participates, from what I have seen P1rataes only has a few small parties, Crows seem to have lost interest in sieging, I saw some Los Banditos. Is it MS's goal to make castle sieges a non activity in Lineage 2? Is there some aspect of the game about controlling castles, other than bragging rights, I do not understand? I am not here to QQ, or whine about the pvp aspect of the game, or complain about visa warriors etc etc. I only want to know IF there is some advantage or motivation for MS to suppress activity in castle sieges? It is working, but is it fun? is it worth it? Would castle sieges be more fun with more and more people participating? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now